Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pryor v. City of Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jerome Pryor
Defendant:
City of Charleston, Detective W. McCabe, Cory Jarett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Means v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00526
Plaintiff:
Christina Gail Means
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. Peterson et al
as 2:2020cv00561
Defendant:
D. Harvey, The City of South Charleston and E. M. Peterson
Plaintiff:
William Allen Means
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Means v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04179
Plaintiff:
Vickie Means
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10021
Plaintiff:
Sandra Means
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv14767
Plaintiff:
Brenda Means
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Means v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv21674
Plaintiff:
Sharron Means
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abram et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv13957
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Means Abram and James Henry Abram
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shaffer v. City of South Charleston et al
as 2:2013cv12450
Plaintiff:
Billy Shaffer
Defendant:
City of South Charleston , Pat C. Rader , Robert Yeager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Means et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv05259
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Means and Michael Means
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
