Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Huffman v. Deel et al
as 7:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
R. Deel, Appalachian Detention Center's Medical Dept. and ADC's Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jensen v. Daughtery et al
as 3:2022cv00816
Plaintiff:
Devon Jensen
Defendant:
D. Daughtery, R. Langford, S. Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boone v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail Medical Dept. Staff
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Earl B. Boone, Sr.
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail Medical Dept. Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Jackson v. Dameron et al
as 7:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Daniel Neil Jackson
Defendant:
D. Dameron, Dr. K. Smith and Augusta Correctional Center Medical Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Middle River Regional Jail Medical Dept
as 7:2021cv00588
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcho v. Cane et al
as 1:2021cv00339
Defendant:
Henrico Jail East Medical Dept and Dr. J Cane
Plaintiff:
Colin Marcho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Harrisonburg-Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Dept.
as 7:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Harrisonburg-Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Dept.
Plaintiff:
Norris Ellwood Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Gregory et al
as 1:2020cv01007
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Hughes
Defendant:
Gregory, Dr. Cane and Medical Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Carlton
as 7:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Howard Carlton, Southern West of Virginia Regional Jail, Medical Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petion v. Cpl. Gregor et al
as 1:2020cv00104
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail, RRJ Medical Dept and Cpl. Gregor
Plaintiff:
Berry Petion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
