Cases 1 - 10 of 7,613
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv07831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Medina v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2025cv07828
Plaintiff:
Angel Lucio Medina
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Swaney v. Greene County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2025cv00233
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Swaney
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Scott Anger, Greene County Adult Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Medina v. Ventura County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2025cv06274
Plaintiff:
James Medina
Defendant:
Ventura County Sheriff's Department and Ventura County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medina v. AT&T Inc.
as 2:2025at00869
Plaintiff:
Norma Medina
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Medina v. AT&T Inc.
as 2:2025cv01877
Plaintiff:
Norma Medina
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Vanessa Ayala v. Wake County, North Carolina
as 25-1738
Plaintiff:
VANESSA AGUILAR AYALA, MARWA SAAD EL METWALLY, KAREEMELDIN ELAZAB and others
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, VALERIE MITCHELL, CINDY BURCHETTE EVANS and others
Medina v. Dudek
as 25-4085
Plaintiff:
JOHN MEDINA
Defendant:
LELAND DUDEK, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Iriarte Fernandez v. Noem et al
as 1:2025cv07366
Plaintiff:
Alberto Iriarte Fernandez
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Angelica Alfonso-Royals and Director Martha Medina-Maltes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.