Cases 41 - 50 of 646
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deem v. Schumer et al
as 7:2022cv08655
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Deem
Defendant:
Chuck Schumer, Jamaal Bowman, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reynoso Santana et al v. Pupy Grocery Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv08292
Plaintiff:
Venecia Reynoso Santana
Defendant:
Pupy Grocery Corp. doing business as Pupy Deli Grocery, William Medina and Juan Roberto Medina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Medina v. DuBois et al
as 7:2022cv08051
Plaintiff:
Luis Medina
Defendant:
Sheriff Carl E. DuBois, Wellpath NY LLC, Doctor Salwa Khouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gonzalez-Russell et al
as 1:2022cv07384
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
Eileen Gonzalez-Russell, ELAINE VELEZ, Dr. Michelle Small and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Michelle Medina
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Medina v. Shoapour et al
as 2:2022cv04327
Plaintiff:
Melonie Medina
Defendant:
Hossein Shoapour, Vlora Sakipi and ELRAC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Mendez (Matos)
as 22-1561
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Luis Mendez, Hector Santiago, Helbert Calo-Birriel, AKA Helbert Calo-Birreiel and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Samuel Matos
Medina v. Capodanno Properties LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05449
Plaintiff:
Lorie Medina
Defendant:
Capodanno Properties LLC, Waterfront Cafe Inc. and John Toto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
