Cases 71 - 80 of 187
Miguel Romero v. Colby Braun
as 15-3875
Petitioner - Appellant:
Miguel Humberto Medina Romero
Respondent - Appellee:
Colby Braun, Warden, NDSP
United States v. Rodolfo Medina-Topete
as 15-3824
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Rodolfo Medina-Topete
Medina v. Thurber et al
as 8:2015cv00442
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Defendant:
Michael Thurber and Kevin Witcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lancaster County et al
as 8:2015cv00436
Defendant:
Lancaster County and Lancaster County Public Defenders Office
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. USA
as 5:2015cv05268
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frank Medina, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Medina v. Thurber et al
as 8:2015cv00332
Defendant:
Chief Medical Officer, Brenda Fisher, Bradley Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez et al v. Black Hills Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Miguel B. Perez and Luis Olivares Medina
Defendant:
Black Hills Trucking, Inc. and Melvin L. Nordhagen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Eriberto Medina-Aranda
as 15-2240
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Eriberto Moises Medina-Aranda, also known as Ernesto Perez-Llamos, also known as Ernesto Perez-Garcia, also known as Ediberto Medina, also known as Hugo Vargas, also known as Rodolfo Diaz, also known as Heriberto M. Medina
Romero v. Braun
as 1:2015cv00047
Petitioner:
Miguel Humberto Medina Romero
Respondent:
Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeremy Pinson, et al v. B. Ramos, et al
as 15-1662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeremy Pinson, Christopher Allen Coates and Tammy Sue Coates
Plaintiff:
Debra Pinson
Defendant - Appellee:
B. Ramos, SIS Technician, Miguel Medina, Associate Warden, Linda Sanders, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
