Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Baker v. Megan
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Baker
Defendant:
Megan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEST BEND INSURANCE COMPANY v. INTEGRITY BACKYARD BUILDS, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
WEST BEND INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
INTEGRITY BACKYARD BUILDS, LLC, TIMOTHY BROWN and MEGAN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
STACY SMITH
Defendant:
LISA ARMSTRONG, OFFICER COUCH, MEGAN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
MEGAN N. THOMPSON
Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, NICK SMITH, PAUL BICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
LONI YOLANDA CHAMBERS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Megan King
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ROSENBAUM v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
MEGAN A. ROSENBAUM
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNELLIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
MEGAN C. MCNELLIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
