Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Bomprezzi v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2017cv01739
Petitioner:
Mel Bomprezzi
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. Garvin et al
as 6:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mel Bennett
Defendant:
Jeremy Garvin, Tim Burgess and Christian Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection District et al
as 4:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Debra M Cooper
Defendant:
Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection District , James Mathew Shockley, Mel W Dainty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. USA
as 1:2016cv01437
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ismael Mel Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RCHFU, LLC et al v. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv01301
Defendant:
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation and Cobalt Travel Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
RCHFU, LLC, Carl Eichstaedt, III, Carla P Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Thompson v. Coulter
as 16-4042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MEL COULTER
Allred et al v. Pacificorp
as 2:2015cv00448
Plaintiff:
James Allred , Judy Allred , Frank Ammons and others
Defendant:
Pacificorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC and others
Beyers v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07132
Plaintiff:
Mel Beyers
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harper v. Rudek, et al
as 15-6033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE E. HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUDEK, Warden, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, CARL BEAR, Warden's Assistant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
