Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Contreras v. Sandvik et al
as 0:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mel Contreras
Defendant:
Kirby Sandvik and ASP of Moorhead, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mel Foster Company, Inc. v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Mel Foster Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Contreras v. Barker et al
as 0:2023cv02500
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mel Contreras
Defendant:
J Barker and Hennipen County Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beyers v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00796
Plaintiff:
Mel Beyers
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gulsvig et al v. Peterick et al
as 0:2013cv01309
Plaintiff:
Candace Gulsvig , Mel Gulsvig and John Schmoll
Defendant:
Mikki Jo Peterick , Mille Lacs County , Michael Campion and others
Solum et al v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Houston, The et al
as 0:2011cv02952
Plaintiff:
Matthew Solum , Beth Solum , Mel Davy, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Houston, The , Board of Adjustment for the County of Houston, Minnesota, The , Planning Commission for the County of Houston, Minnesota, The and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners for the County of Houston, The , Board of Adjustment for the County of Houston, Minnesota, The , Bob Scanlan and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Jared Solum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kofsky et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Elaine Kofsky and Mel Kofsky
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
