Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Paixao v. City of Greenwood et al
as 4:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Brenda Paixao
Defendant:
City of Greenwood, County of Leflore, Greenwood Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Donald Glen Melton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Melton et al v. Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
David B. Melton, 247 Farms, Inc. and Pea Patch Road Farms LLP
Defendant:
Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Unger v. W.C.R.C.F. et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Thomas Unger
Defendant:
W.C.R.C.F., Sheriff Melton M. Gaston and Lt. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Davalin Devell Melton, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melton v. Centurion et al
as 5:2018cv00121
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Centurion and Dr. J. Burke
Plaintiff:
Barry Lemax Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Centurion et al
as 5:2018cv00119
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Centurion and Dr. J. Burke
Plaintiff:
Barry Lemax Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Centurion et al
as 5:2018cv00116
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Centurion and Dr. J. Burke
Plaintiff:
Barry Lemax Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
