Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Kimbrough v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Rachel Kimbrough
Defendant:
Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County Oklahoma, Lisa Hooker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Malone-Melton v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Gregory Kyle Malone-Melton
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RX Medical LLC et al v. Melton et al
as 5:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
RX Medical LLC, ROK Sales LLC and ROK Medical Managment LLC
Defendant:
Rob Melton, Justin Poos, Brady Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Melton v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
Makala R. Melton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Monica Williams v. Melton Truck Lines, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00184
Defendant:
Melton Truck Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Monica Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
