Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Jones v. Cocowalk Anchor, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv22477
Defendant: Cocowalk Anchor, LLC doing business as Spanglish Craft Cocktail Bar + Kitchen doing business as Grails Sports Bar and William G. Smith
Plaintiff: Melvin Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Diedrick et al
as 1:2023cv01610
Plaintiff: Melvin Jones
Defendant: John Diedrick, Montrell Bridges, James Eisinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03657
Plaintiff: MELVIN JONES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10658
Plaintiff: OSHUN MELVIN JONES
Defendant: 3M and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Wexford Health Source Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01026
Plaintiff: Melvin Jones
Defendant: Wexford Health Source Inc, Andrew Tilden, John Burle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leanne Walters, et al v. City of Flint, MI, et al
as 22-2083
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LEANNE WALTERS
Interested Party: MELVIN JONES, JR.
Defendant: CITY OF FLINT, MI
Leanne Walters, et al v. City of Flint, MI, et al
as 22-2042
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LEANNE WALTERS
Interested Party: MELVIN JONES, JR.
Defendant: CITY OF FLINT, MI
Jones
as 5:2022mc51723
Leanne Walters, et al v. City of Flint, MI, et al
as 22-2040
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LEANNE WALTERS
Interested Party: MELVIN JONES, JR.
Defendant: CITY OF FLINT, MI
Leanne Walters, et al v. City of Flint, MI, et al
as 22-2014
Not Classified By Court: In re: FLINT WATER CASES
Plaintiff: LEANNE WALTERS
Interested Party: MELVIN JONES, JR.
Defendant: CITY OF FLINT, MI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?