Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson v. Hall et al
as 6:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnson
Defendant:
G Hall, Stacy Richardson, Melvin Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Weaver v. Cox Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02596
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Bledsoe Weaver
Defendant:
Cox Transportation Services, Inc. and Melvin Warren Osterbind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Royal v. Cox Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02348
Plaintiff:
Paul Royal
Defendant:
Cox Transportation Services, Inc. and Melvin Warren Osterbind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
USA v. Melvin Rivers
as 23-50043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MELVIN WARREN RIVERS, AKA Juice Lee
USA v. Melvin Rivers
as 22-55852
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MELVIN WARREN RIVERS, AKA Juice Lee
Melvin Warren Rivers v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv09619
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers and Juice Lee
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Hulu, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Rivers v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2020cv00792
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers and Juice Lee
Defendant:
San Diego County, Alessandra Serano and Vincent Bales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rivers v. Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv00580
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, San Diego County and Adam L. Braverman
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rivers v. Becerra et al
as 4:2020cv00863
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, San Diego County and Adam L. Braverman
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Warren Rivers v. Fox Broadcasting Company Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv07554
Defendant:
Lifetime Entertainment, Fox Entertainment Group Inc., John Walsh and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Warren Rivers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
