Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Towns v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2018cv01455
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Menard Correctional Center and M. Siddiqui
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Towns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Menard Correctional Center
as 1:2018cv04496
Defendant:
Menard Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Terrance Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Mulholland et al
as 3:2018cv01064
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
Mr Mulholland, William Qualls, Furlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Davis v. Mrs. Rodely, et al
as 18-1944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA J. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. RODELY, WOOD, POLICE OFFICER COWEN and others
Leach, Sr. v. Menard Correctional Center et al
as 3:2018cv00947
Plaintiff:
Javarus Leach, Sr.
Defendant:
Menard Correctional Center, Dr Ritz, M. Siddiqui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Ollie v. Michael Atchinson, et al
as 18-1412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT OLLIE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ATCHINSON, Deputy Commander, Southern Region Investigation and Intelligence Unit Law Enforcement Liaison, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Former Director IDOC, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Warden, Menard Correctional Center and others
Van Pelt v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv00423
Defendant:
John Doe and Warden of Menard Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Van Pelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole, Sr. v. Menard Correctional Center
as 3:2018cv00085
Petitioner:
Brent Cole, Sr.
Respondent:
Menard Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watford v. Trost et al
as 3:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Watford
Defendant:
John Trost, Dawn Ghafther, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01259
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Elias Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
