Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
R. A. v. Henn, et al.
as 26-4441
Petitioner:
R. A., a minor
Respondent:
CHRIS HENN, Chief Probation Officer, County of Merced, California and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04086
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Doe (HT-00016) v. Hsien Chang Yan & Mei Yun Yan, et al
as 2:2026cv01821
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (HT-00016)
Defendant:
Hsien Chang Yan & Mei Yun Yan, Vijay Solanki, Urmila Solanki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Nagata et al v. City of Merced et al
as 1:2026cv03510
Plaintiff:
Stuart John Tsuneo Nagata, Annabelle Perez and Martin Olvera-Santoya
Defendant:
City of Merced, Calvin Haygood, Adrian Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
