Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) et al v. Vann Companies, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv02925
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) and Merchants National Bonding, Inc.
Defendant:
Vann Companies, LLC and Michael Vann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) et al v. Arkansas Construction Solutions LLC et al
as 5:2018cv05078
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) and Merchants National Bonding, Inc.
Defendant:
Arkansas Construction Solutions LLC, R.L. Stockett & Associates LLC, Rick L. Stockett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Accurate Controls, Inc v. Cerro Gordo County Board of Supervisors et al DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE, FILE ALL DOCUMENTS IN LEAD CASE C08-3021MWB
as 3:2009cv03001
Plaintiff:
Accurate Controls, Inc
Defendant:
Cerro Gordo County Board of Supervisors, Dean Snyder Construction Co and Merchants Bond Company (Mutual)
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Accurate Controls, Inc v. Cerro Gordo County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2008cv03035
Plaintiff:
Accurate Controls, Inc, Accurate Controls, Inc and Accurate Controls, Inc
Defendant:
Cerro Gordo County Board of Supervisors, Dean Snyder Construction Co and Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual)
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Accurate Controls, Inc. v Cerro Gordo County Board of Supervisors, et al
as 3:2008cv03021
Plaintiff:
Accurate Controls, Inc, Accurate Controls, Inc and Accurate Controls, Inc
Defendant:
Cerro Gordo County Board of Supervisors, Merchants Bond Company (Mutual) and Dean Snyder Construction Co
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv04037
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual), Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) and Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual)
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
