Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Gentile v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv20000
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and Merck Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Gentile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentile v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04174
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Gentile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A. Griffin
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oklahoma State Education Employees Group Insurance Board v. Merck & Co Inc
as 5:2009cv00966
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State Education Employees Group Insurance Board
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Villarreal v. Villarreal et al
as 2:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
Adelfa Villarreal and Leandro Villarreal
Defendant:
James Geddes, Actavis Totowa LLC, Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Apfel v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01344
Plaintiff:
Jerome Apfel
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Payne v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv04208
Plaintiff:
Iley Joe Payne
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and SCHERING-PLOUGH CORP.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILKINS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2008cv02554
Plaintiff:
JUNE WILKINS
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Arasimowicz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02490
Plaintiff:
Edward Arasimowicz
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, SCHERING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bowers v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02163
Plaintiff:
Lois Roberta Bowers
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Schering-Plough Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
