Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Barbee v. Meriwether County, Georgia
as 3:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
David Barbee
Defendant:
Meriwether County, Georgia
Smith v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45306
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Chuck Smith in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Meriwether County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Meriwether County, Georgia v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45305
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Meriwether County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Reynolds v. Meriwether County, Georgia et al
as 3:2018cv00084
Defendant:
Amber Ritter, Meriwether County, Georgia, Ms. Lori Chatham and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Meriwether County, Georgia
as 3:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
David Poole
Defendant:
Meriwether County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Vandiver v. Meriwether County, Georgia
as 3:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Paul Vandiver
Defendant:
Meriwether County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jerome M. Jenkins , Lacathy C. Kendrick and Teresa G. Moultrie
Defendant:
Chuck Smith , Meriwether County Sheriff's Office and Meriwether County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks et al v. Meriwether County, Georgia et al
as 3:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jaterrio Brooks , Jimtavias Thompson , Terrell D. Amey and others
Defendant:
Meriwether County, Georgia and Steve Whitlock
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
