Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Stedman v. Warden
as 1:2021cv00447
Defendant:
Warden
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stedman v. Garlock
as 1:2020cv03470
Defendant:
M. Garlock
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stedman v. Campbell
as 1:2020cv03331
Defendant:
Warden Casey M. Campbell, Commissioner of Corrections and Robert L. Green
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Merrick Stedman v. Dayena Corcoran
as 19-6681
Petitioner / Appellant:
MERRICK STEDMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAYENA CORCORAN, Warden and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Stedman v. Pierce et al
as 1:2018cv01801
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Defendant:
Holly Pierce, CRNP, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Crestpointe Corporate Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stedman v. Parrish et al
as 1:2015cv00463
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Defendant:
Parrish, Prince George's County Police Department and Hyattsville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stedman v. Maynard et al
as 1:2012cv03458
Plaintiff:
Merrick Stedman
Defendant:
Gary Maynard, John Wolfe and S. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrick Stedman v. J. White
as 11-6974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERRICK STEDMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. WHITE, Case Manager Mr. and C. ZIES, Case Manager Ms.
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
