Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Anderson v. Matthews et al
as 1:2024cv00518
Defendant:
Cpl. Pearson, John 1-5 Doe, Casey Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Joseph Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. v. Adaptive Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2024cv05786
Plaintiff:
MESO SCALE DIAGNOSTICS, LLC.
Defendant:
Adaptive Manufacturing Technologies, Inc. doing business as Quickpouch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Goodman (Evans)
as 24-1258
Defendant:
WILLIE EVANS, JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Goodman (Jamarr Simmons)
as 23-7971
Defendant:
JERLAINE LITTLE, DARON GOODMAN, ALBERT SHOULDERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMARR SIMMONS and Sealed Defendant 2
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Goodman (Little)
as 23-6692
Defendant:
DARON GOODMAN, JAMARR SIMMONS, WILLIE EVANS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JERLAINE LITTLE and Noni
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Willis v. CIA/USSS -gate et al
as 3:2022cv01599
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
CIA/USSS -gate, FBI -gate, Meso - gate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roche Diagnostics Corporation v. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC
as 21-1633
Counter Defendant:
BIOVERIS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Counter Claimant:
MESO SCALE DIAGNOSTICS, LLC
Roche Diagnostics Corporation v. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC
as 21-1609
Counter Claimant:
MESO SCALE DIAGNOSTICS, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Counter Defendant:
BIOVERIS CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
