Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sheila Dunn et al v. Rodd S. McMinn et al
as 2:2019cv03822
Defendant:
Wealth Management Group of Upstate New York, Inc., Metlife Securities, Inc., Michael Solinkski and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Dunn and Russell Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pugh et al v. Metlife, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01504
Defendant:
Metlife, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metlife Resouces, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tillman Pugh and Margaret Sulkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pugh et al v. Metlife, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01506
Defendant:
Metlife, Inc. , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , Metlife Resources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tillman Pugh , Margaret Sulkowski , David Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brandon Johnson v. Metlife Inc et al
as 8:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Metlife Inc, Metlife Securities Inc and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Spinedex Physical Therapy USA, et al v. United Healthcare of Arizona,, et al
as 12-17604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPINEDEX PHYSICAL THERAPY USA INCORPORATED, CLAUDE ARAGON, JACK ADAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED HEALTHCARE OF ARIZONA, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv04046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv04475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Spinedex Physical Therapy USA Inc v. United Healthcare of Arizona, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00457
Plaintiff:
Spinedex Physical Therapy USA Inc and Spinedex Physical Therapy USA Inc
Defendant:
United Healthcare of Arizona, Inc., Ingenix Inc, UnitedHealth Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
