Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Denny v. Metropolitan Council et al
as 0:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
Myron Denny
Defendant:
Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Council, The, Metropolitan Transit Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 22-35572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BATON ROUGE, CITY OF BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES WEBER and others
Mhanna et al v. Metropolitan Council et al
as 0:2021cv01974
Plaintiff:
Tammy A Mhanna, Theresa L Johnson, Tammy A. Mhanna and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Council, Officer Matt Wilkinson, Officer Liam Pham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv02660
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. City East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2018cv01010
Defendant:
XYZ Police Officers, Chief Murphy J. Paul, Jr. East Baton Rouge Police Department, City/Metropolitan Council and others
Plaintiff:
Roblisa Knight and Waconda Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
