Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ronald Douglas v. Eric Schmitt, et al
as 19-3700
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security & Empls of the Social Admin, Janet L. Schanzle, Security Armored Car & It's Insurers, Elaine L. Chao, U. S. Secretary of Transportation & Employees of the Federal Aviation Admin and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Douglas
Fondren v. Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center, et al
as 4:2018cv01755
Defendant:
Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center and Edward Worman
Plaintiff:
Corey Fondren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betts v. Boone County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv04015
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Sherron Betts
Defendant:
Boone County Jail, Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center, Edwin Wolfgram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harlston v. Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center
as 4:2013cv01489
Plaintiff:
Michael Harlston
Defendant:
Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. State of Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 4:2012cv01432
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Watson
Defendant:
State of Missouri Department of Mental Health , Keith Schafer , Laurent D. Javois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Bryant v. Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center et al
as 4:2008cv01884
Plaintiff:
Martino O'Bryant
Defendant:
Metropolitan St. Louis Psychiatric Center, John Does, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
