Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Roy et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
as 2:2020cv03433
Plaintiff:
Lynne L. Roy, Melissa Kaiser, Melanie C. Roy and others
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Mineral Company, Kaiser Gypsum Company, Chanel. Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARBALLO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00636
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA CARBALLO
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO AMERICAN TALC COMPANY, METROPOLITAN TALC COMPANY, INC., CHARLES MATHIEU, INC., RESOURCE PROCESSORS, INC. AND WINDSOR MINERALS, MINERAL AND PIGMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. f/k/a WHITTAKER, CLARK & DANIELS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KIRKWOOD v. CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv14947
Defendant:
CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO AMERICAN TALC COMPANY, METROPOLITAN TALC COMPANY, INC., CHARLES MATHIEU, INC., RESOURCE PROCESSORS, INC. AND WINDSOR MINERALS, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY JO KIRKWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA et al
as 3:2019cv12231
Defendant:
CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO AMERICAN TALC COMPANY, METROPOLITAN TALC COMPANY, INC., CHARLES MATHIEU, INC., RESOURCE PROCESSORS, INC. AND WINDSOR MINERALS, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-50, BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
BILLIE N. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Socorro Pacheco Arciga et al v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company et al
as 2:2019cv03700
Plaintiff:
Socorro Arciga, Kimberly Ann Adams, Amy Gilmore and others
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, United Talc Company, Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc. and others
Estate Plaintiff:
John Currie
Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Minassian et al v. Brenntag North America et al
as 1:2018cv09708
Petitioner:
Whitaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to AMerican Talc Company, Inc., Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc., Charles Mathieu, Inc. and Resource Processors, Inc.
Defendant:
Imerys Talc America, Inc., Brenntag Specialties Inc. as a successor-in-interest to Mineral Pigment Solutions, Inc., as as successor-in-interest to Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Brenntag North America and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Minassian and Donald Minassian
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., as successor-in-interest to American Talc Company, Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc., Charles Mathieu, Inc, and Resource Processors, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Windsor Minerals, Inc., JOHN DOE 1 through JOHN DOE 75 (fictitious) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
