Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Morgan v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Dale Morgan
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police, Centre County, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BROWN v. QUINN et al
as 2:2020cv02021
Defendant:
OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY PA and MICHAEL QUINN
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BROWN v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv04350
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. BROWN
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER PHARMA AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON C.F.C.F.
as 2:2015cv06183
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. BROWN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON C.F.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv02945
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. BROWN
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SURGICK v. HARLEYSVILLE NATIONAL BANK et al
as 2:2012cv07198
Plaintiff:
ZEFFIE N. SURGICK
Defendant:
HARLEYSVILLE NATIONAL BANK, HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY, HARLEYSVILLE GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Scism
as 3:2011cv00419
Petitioner:
Michael K Brown
Respondent:
William Scism
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53535
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. BROWN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HONEY BROOK ESTATES, LLC v. HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIP, et al
as 2:2009cv06190
Defendant:
HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIP, HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff:
HONEY BROOK ESTATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
