Cases 1 - 10 of 13
David Sifuentes, III v. Midland County, MI 42nd Cir Ct, et al
as 23-1121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDLAND COUNTY, MI 42ND CIRCUIT COURT, J. DEE BROOKS, MICHAEL D. CARPENTER and others
Carpenter v. Ponds
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Carpenter
Defendant:
A.W. Ponds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Ponds
as 1:2021cv01112
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Carpenter
Defendant:
A.W. Ponds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Sifuentes v. Midland County, MI 42nd Cir Ct, et al
as 21-1199
Defendant / Appellee:
MIDLAND COUNTY, MI 42ND CIRCUIT COURT, MICHAEL D. CARPENTER, J. DEE BROOKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES
USA v. Michael Carpenter
as 19-2314
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES CARPENTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daugherty v. Carpenter
as 2:2017cv12310
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Daugherty
Defendant:
Michael B Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mcintire v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv10833
Plaintiff:
James Mcintire
Defendant:
Ally Financial Inc. , Christopher A. Balmy , David J. Debrunner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
National Shopmen Pension Fund v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv10289
Plaintiff:
National Shopmen Pension Fund
Defendant:
Ally Financial Inc. , Michael A. Carpenter , Christopher A. Halmy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Bucks County Employees Retirement Fund v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv14104
Plaintiff:
Bucks County Employees Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Ally Financial Inc. , Michael A Carpenter , Christopher A Halmy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Carpenter #442122 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2013cv00367
Plaintiff:
Michael James Carpenter #442122
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
