Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Harris, et al. v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Derek Harris, Jon Arvelo, Christopher Charles Baird and others
Defendant:
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc., Hawai'i Electric Light Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Michael X. Bell v. Jessie Carranza
as 2:2021cv00233
Defendant:
Jessie Carranza
Plaintiff:
Michael X. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael D. Bell v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01752
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Ford Motor Company, P.F. Automotive, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Bell v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv00540
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2018cv00127
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Ford Motor Company, P.F. Automotive, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc Removal- Breach of Contract
Bell v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2017cv08266
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Michael A Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suscavage v. Silver Spring Networks, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv06625
Plaintiff:
Ben Suscavage
Defendant:
Silver Spring Networks, Inc., Scott A. Lang, Thomas R. Kuhn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. ST Charles Health Systems et al
as 6:2017cv00971
Defendant:
"Physician", Michael L Bell, Bend Neurological Associates and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Bell v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05441
Plaintiff:
Michael W Bell
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Bell, Jr. v. Daniel Paramo
as 17-71507
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ARDIS BELL, Jr.
Respondent:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
