Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Davis v. Terminix International Company, L.P.
as 1:2013cv00947
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Davis
Defendant:
Terminix International Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Davis et al
as 3:2012cv00781
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Michael D. Davis and Michelle M. Davis
Counter_defendant:
Onewest Bank, F.S.B., Samuel I. White, P.C., Eric White and others
Counter_claimant:
Michael D. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Foreclosure
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2012cv00341
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FREDDIE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Jumo et al
as 5:2012ct03043
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Terry Jumo, Ruby Williams, Peter White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE NAME AND LIKENESS LICENSING LITIGATION
as 1:2011mc00063
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MICHAEL KELLER , EDWARD C. O'BANNON, JR. , BRYON BISHOP and others
Defendant:
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and COLLEGIATE LICENSING COMPANY
Interested_party:
ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2011cv00190
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH DAVIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2011cv00035
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOSEPH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. USA
as 7:2010cv00177
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Kenta Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Corbett Package Company et al
as 7:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Corbett Package Company, Corbett Farming Company, Sandra C. Hiatt and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
