Cases 61 - 70 of 100
DAVIS v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2012cv05943
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Michael Davis, II
as 12-10852
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL VAN DAVIS, II
USA v. Michael Davi
as 12-10853
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL VAN DAVIS
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2012cv01246
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Michael Davis, et al v. Electronic Arts Inc.
as 12-15737
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS, AKA Tony Davis, VINCE FERRAGAMO, BILLY JOE DUPREE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
USA v. Michael Davi
as 12-10107
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DAVIS
IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE NAME AND LIKENESS LICENSING LITIGATION
as 1:2011mc00063
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MICHAEL KELLER , EDWARD C. O'BANNON, JR. , BRYON BISHOP and others
Defendant:
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and COLLEGIATE LICENSING COMPANY
Interested_party:
ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE
USA v. Michael Davi
as 11-11006
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DAVIS
Keller et al v. Electronic Arts et al
as 2:2011mc00776
Plaintiff:
Samuel Michael Keller , Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr. , Bryan Bishop and others
Petitioner:
Big Sky Conference
Consol_plaintiff:
Craig Newsome , Danny Wimprine , Damien Rhodes and others
Defendant:
Electronic Arts , National Collegiate Athletic Association and Collegiate Licensing
Amicu:
James Brown and Herbert Anthony Adderley
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
