Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Jones
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Santoyo et al
as 3:2022cv01911
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Guillermo Santoyo, Jr, Joel Gonzalez, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2022cv01905
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Code Enforcement Business et al
as 3:2022cv01907
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Code Enforcement Business, Stacey Graves, The MacFarlane Firm PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Gorman et al
as 3:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Esther Gorman, Gene Gorman, Code Enforcement Cedar Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Sheriff, Liberty County Jail
as 1:2021cv00342
Petitioner:
Michael A Jones
Respondent:
Sheriff, Liberty County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Jones v. R & A Towing, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00618
Defendant:
Milstead Automotive, Ltd., R & A Towing, LLC, Milstead Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Lee Jones
Jones v. Vincent's Roofing, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00873
Defendant:
Vincent's Roofing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Davis
as 5:2018cv00832
Petitioner:
Michael D Jones
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
