Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McGee et al v. Chicago South Shore & South Bend Railroad
as 3:2019cv00585
Plaintiff:
Michael J McGee and Rail Industry Specialist Inc
Defendant:
Chicago South Shore & South Bend Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGee v. Weidmeyer et al
as 2:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Michael I McGee
Defendant:
Lindy Weidmeyer, Claire Evers, Cathy Klecker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lauer et al v. Rochester Building Service Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00391
Plaintiff:
Michael Lauer , William Nix , David Tharp and others
Defendant:
Rochester Building Service Inc and Michael R McGee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
McGee v. Marsh
as 1:2011cv00429
Plaintiff:
Michael L McGee
Defendant:
Cynthia Marsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lauer et al v. Rochester Building Service Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Michael Lauer , William Nix , David Tharp and others
Defendant:
Rochester Building Service Inc and Michael R McGee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lauer et al v. Rochester Building Service Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Michael Lauer, Michael Lauer, William Nix and others
Defendant:
Rochester Building Service Inc and Michael R McGee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McGee v. Shaw et al
as 3:2009cv00466
Plaintiff:
Michael L. McGee
Defendant:
Steven Shaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lauer et al v. McGee
as 2:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Michael Lauer, Michael Lauer, William Nix and others
Defendant:
Rochester Building Service Inc and Michael R McGee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Michael McGee v. Byran Bartow
as 07-3278
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL L. MCGEE
Respondent - Appellee:
BYRAN BARTOW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
