Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Robert Cotton v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 16-56898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A COTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a political subdivision, SCOTT ABERNATHY, as Sheriff's Deputy, JOHN MCMAHON, as Sheriff and others
USA v. Michael Ramo
as 16-50137
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN RAMOS, also known as Michael Ramos
Robert A Cotton v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2015cv02314
Defendant:
Scott Abernathy, County of San Bernardino, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A Cotton
USA v. Michael Ramo
as 15-5605
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHANE RAMOS
Larry Darnell James v. Christine Spencer et al
as 5:2015cv00774
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell James
Defendant:
Bobbie Mann, Michael A Ramos and Christine Spencer
Ramos v. United States Of America
as 7:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Ramos
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Investor Land Services, LLC, et al v. Horizon Communities Improvement Association, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00352
Plaintiff:
Mathew Bell, Butterfield Land Investments, LLC, Kenny T. Duong and others
Defendant:
Jacob T. Bojorquez, Christopher Bustillos, David R. Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harris v. Harris, et al.
as 2:2014cv00977
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
K. Harris, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Marybel Batser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Farrow et al
as 4:2014cv01349
Defendant:
Joseph A. Farrow , John Azavedo , R. Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Celeste Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tomas Perez v. The County of San Bernardino Ct et al
as 5:2014cv00329
Defendant:
City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ron Hoops, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Tomas Perez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
