Cases 1 - 10 of 17
WILSON v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2023cv01282
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. WILSON
Defendant:
GILBERT, SEYE, HOSKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00220
Petitioner:
Michael J Wilson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilson v. Lippert Components Inc
as 3:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wilson
Defendant:
Lippert Components Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Stenger & Stenger PC
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wilson
Defendant:
Stenger & Stenger PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Elkhart County Circuit Court
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wilson
Defendant:
Elkhart County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Engs et al
as 3:2019cv01138
Plaintiff:
Michael L Wilson and Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Lych and Engs
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv01128
Plaintiff:
Michael L Wilson and Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt D Woods and Ron Neal
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv01194
Defendant:
M Slanika, Ron Neal and George Pain
Plaintiff:
Michael L Wilson
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv01123
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson and Michael L Wilson
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Tayler Levinet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04444
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
