Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P. v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P.
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL ADAMS, JR., Richard W. Bloomingdale, AMY BRADLEY and others
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC. v. DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P. et al
as 3:2023cv00067
Defendant:
JULIUS RUDOLPH, DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P., J. ABBOTT R. COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.
Counter Defendant:
KIM W. KUNKLE, DANIEL A. ONORATO and MARK E. PASQUERILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, LP v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, LP
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL ADAMS, JR., AMY BRADLEY, ALLAN R. DENNISON and others
ADAMS et al v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03454
Plaintiff:
CARRIE ADAMS and MICHAEL ADAMS
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anstine v. Adams et al
as 1:2020cv02160
Defendant:
Matthew J. Updegrove, Jane Doe, Jerome Michael Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mark Anstine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. United States Of America
as 3:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LeFever et al v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv01499
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lefever, Robert Cummings, Daniel Greatwater and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Etka v. Adams et al
as 3:2015cv01677
Plaintiff:
Zachary Etka
Defendant:
Michael Adams, Nathan Lewis and Daniel Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS et al v. BOROUGH OF EMSWORTH et al
as 2:2013cv01550
Plaintiff:
CAMILLA EVANS and CAMILLA CONNERS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF EMSWORTH , MICHAEL ADAMS , DAVID EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
