Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Christopher Philip Langan v. Defense Finance & Accounting Service, et al
as 3:2014cv02563
Plaintiff:
Christopher Philip Langan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hoffman et al v. Panetta et al
as 4:2012cv05049
Plaintiff:
Daniele Hoffman , Kole Welsh , Amanda Shaw and others
Defendant:
Leon Panetta, Robert M. Gates, Donald Rumsfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Richard N Colvard v. Eric H Holder Jr et al
as 2:2012cv08162
Plaintiff:
Richard N Colvard
Defendant:
Michael B Donley, Eric H Holder, Jr, Robert S Mueller, III and others
Margaret Witt v. Department of the Air Force, et al
as 12-35596
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARGARET WITT
Defendant - Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Department of Air Force, JANETTE L MOORE-HARBERT, Commander, 446th Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, McChord AFB; and others
Schweitzer v. Panetta et al
as 4:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Brian Schweitzer
Defendant:
Leon E. Panetta and Michael B. Donley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03700
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
