Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
City Of North Las Vegas v. Clark County Nevada et al
as 2:2011cv00944
Counter Defendant:
City Of North Las Vegas
Plaintiff:
City Of North Las Vegas
Counter Claimant:
Clark County Nevada
Defendant:
Clark County Nevada, Michael B. Donley, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 3:2010cv05627
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Almy , Anthony J. Loverde and Jason D. Knight
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Robert M. Gates, Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Margaret Witt v. Department of the Air Force, et al
as 10-36079
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARGARET WITT
Defendant - Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, ROBERT M. GATES, Secretary of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Department of Air Force and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.