Cases 21 - 30 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Hoffman et al v. Panetta et al
as 4:2012cv05049
Plaintiff:
Daniele Hoffman , Kole Welsh , Amanda Shaw and others
Defendant:
Leon Panetta, Robert M. Gates, Donald Rumsfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Richard N Colvard v. Eric H Holder Jr et al
as 2:2012cv08162
Plaintiff:
Richard N Colvard
Defendant:
Michael B Donley, Eric H Holder, Jr, Robert S Mueller, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Margaret Witt v. Department of the Air Force, et al
as 12-35596
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARGARET WITT
Defendant - Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of the Department of Air Force, JANETTE L MOORE-HARBERT, Commander, 446th Aeromedical Evacuation Squadron, McChord AFB; and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
