Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clemence, David et al v. County of Oneida et al
as 3:2020cv00974
Defendant:
Oneida County Sheriff's Office, Timothy Johnson, Michael Baran and others
Plaintiff:
David Clemence and Medicare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Geboy, Mark v. Oneida County et al
as 3:2019cv00574
Defendant:
Oneida County Sheriff's Office, Timothy Johnson, Michael Baran and others
Plaintiff:
Network Health Plan, Mark M. Geboy and State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant:
Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified:
Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party:
James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master:
Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robin McEntee
In Re:
Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other:
Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Baranic v. Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv00509
Plaintiff:
Michael Baranic, Michael Baranic, Michael Baranic and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
