Cases 1 - 10 of 52
R.K.W. v. Washington County Sheriff's Office Department et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
R.K.W.
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Washington County, VA Sheriff's Office, William Smarr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ngo v. Washington County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Ngo
Defendant:
Blake Andis, Washington County, VA Sheriff's Office, William Smarr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Elix v. Vann et al
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey Elix
Defendant:
Timothy Vann, Wayne McKinney and Stephens County SFDP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felice et al v. Westpark Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10138
Plaintiff:
Phil Felice, Dawn Felice, Michael Carey and others
Defendant:
Westpark Capital, Inc., Robert Ainbinder, Michael Ainbinder and others
Carey v. Village of Orland Park et al
as 1:2023cv04421
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey
Defendant:
Village Of Orland Park, Officer Brent La Ha, Officer Glenn Devries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Thomas Lutge v. Tyra Harrington, et al
as 23-15057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS H. LUTGE, P.E.
Defendant / Appellee:
TYRA HARRINGTON, J.D. and M.B.A., MICHAEL CAREY, MARK FRANCESCHI and others
CAREY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14662
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL CAREY, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lutge, P.E. v. Harrington, J.D. and M.B.A. et al
as 4:2022cv00585
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Lutge, P.E.
Defendant:
Tyra Harrington, J.D. and M.B.A., Michael Carey, Mark Franceschi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Michael Carey
as 21-50122
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL CAREY, AKA Garrocha
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael Carey
as 20-50353
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL CAREY, AKA Garrocha
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
