Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Busch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04165
Petitioner:
Michael Charles Busch
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Mayberry v. Cates
as 1:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Mayberry
Defendant:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
Michael Charles Busch
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Demos, Jr. v. Washington State Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-35567
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Contract Attorneys, MICHAEL CHARLES KAHRS and JEAN SCHIEDLER-BROWN & ASSOCIATES
Walsh v. Carter, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Michael-Charles Walsh
Defendant:
Carter, County of, Carter County Circuit Court, Mary M. Godsy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Braddick v. USA
as 3:2022cv01507
Petitioner:
Michael Charles Braddick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Michael Charles DeSue v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 22-10841
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL CHARLES DESUE
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
McNall v. Dumire
as 6:2022cv00267
Petitioner:
Michael Charles McNall
Respondent:
Donovan Dumire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walsh v. Privette et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Michael-Charles: Walsh
Defendant:
Steven A. Privette, Howell County Circuit Court and Suzanne Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. Carter County Circuit Court
as 1:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael-Charles: Walsh
Defendant:
Carter County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
