Cases 1 - 10 of 454
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1183
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wassouf v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2010cv11169
Plaintiff:
George Samir Wassouf
Defendant:
United States Department Of Justice, United States Immmigration and Custom Enforcement "ICE, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv10367
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Edwardo Mathew v. Cornell Companies, Inc., et al
as 10-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARDO ALEXANDRO MATHEW
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE CHADBOURNE, MICHAEL WEBSTER, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Defendant:
DONALD WYATT DETENTION FACILITY INCORPORATED, WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., TIMOTHY E. TAPLEY and others
Wassouf et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv11738
Plaintiff:
George Samir Wassouf and USCIS
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
