Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Olmos #196384 v. Copciac et al
as 3:2024cv08048
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Defendant:
Amanda Copciac, Jocelyn Myers, Jeff Gallimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittle v. Cimino et al
as 2:2023cv02219
Petitioner:
Harold Day Whittle
Respondent:
Michael Cimino and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Olmos v. Michael Cimino, et al
as 23-15685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS, named as Timothy Olmos
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CIMINO, named as Chief Probation Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, ERWINN PRIETO, Probation Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, originally named as Edwin Prieto, changed per [9], ARMIDA HERNANDEZ, Surveillance Officer, Maricopa County Adult Probation Department and others
Devin Andrich v. Michael Cimino, et al
as 22-15141
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CIMINO, ALLISTER ADEL, Maricopa County Attorney and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Nannette Hummel v. Maricopa County Adult Probatio, et al
as 21-16548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NANNETTE G. HUMMEL
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY ADULT PROBATION DEPARTMENT and MICHAEL CIMINO, Chief Probation Officer, Adult Probation Department, Superior Court of Arizona in and for Maricopa County, in his official capacity
Thompson v. Cimino et al
as 2:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Thompson
Defendant:
Michael Cimino and Barbara Broderick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Cassise v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 20-72900
Respondent:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, MICHAEL CIMINO, Maricopa County, Arizona Adult Probation and ANEESHA GAINES, Maricopa County, Arizona Adult Probation
Petitioner:
LOUIS JOSEPH CASSISE
Andrich v. Cimino et al
as 2:2020cv01649
Respondent:
Allister Adel, Michael Cimino, Mark Brnovich and others
Petitioner:
Devin Andrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00633
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Olmos v. Cimino et al
as 2:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Michael Cimino, Psychological & Consulting Services, Paul Penzone and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
