Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CONAWAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv72988
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONAWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayo v. The State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement Division et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
Andrea Nichole Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
The State of Alabama Department of Human Resources Child Support Enforcement Division, Maurice A. Eggleston, Victoria Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Capps et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Christopher Capps, Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo v. Eggleston et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 1:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Andrea Eggleston Mayo
Defendant:
Maurice Alfonso Eggleston, Dana Horn Eggleston, John Calvin White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Moulton et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2013cv00766
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Moulton, Michael Conaway, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evester McDaniel v. Romel Cody, et al
as 12-15452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVESTER MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
ROMEL CODY, BRAD MENDHEIM, DANIEL JOHNSON and others
McDaniel v. Cody et al (MAG+)
as 1:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
Evester McDaniel
Defendant:
Romel Cody, Brad Mendheim, R. Cliff Mendheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Conaway et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2011cv00808
Plaintiff:
Terreko Demese Thomas
Defendant:
J. Michael Conaway, C. Lawson Little, Dothan City Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubenstein v. Bauman et al (MAG+)
as 1:2007cv00798
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Bauman Rubenstein
Defendant:
Betty Jo Bauman, Marilyn Bauman Granger, Barbara Bauman Kamensky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
