Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Chanh Trinh et al v. Brian Birkholz et al
as 2:2023cv04521
Plaintiff:
Chanh V. Trinh, Brian E. Sawyers, Dennis McPherson and others
Defendant:
Brian Birkholz, Bureau of Prisons, Law Office of Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Miller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FILING ERROR
as 5:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MILLER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. Michael Miller
as 21-30230
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. MILLER
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00299
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D MILLER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drinking Post, L.L.C., The v. County Line Hardware, L.L.C et al
as 1:2020cv01184
Plaintiff:
The Drinking Post, L.L.C. and Drinking Post, L.L.C., The
Defendant:
COUNTY LINE HARDWARE, L.L.C and Michael D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
OYEBANJI v. MILLER et al
as 2:2019cv13158
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA OYEBANJI
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. MILLER, JOHN DOE A TO Z and ERNESTINE MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MCCOY v. MILLER
as 2:2019cv13141
Plaintiff:
ERNESTINE MCCOY
Defendant:
MICHAEL D MILLER and JOHN DOES A to Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Powell v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2019cv01408
Defendant:
Carl Biggs, Michael D. Miller, General Casualty Company of Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff:
Nichelle Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
