Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Gonzales v. Dryden et al
as 7:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Dean Gonzales
Defendant:
Attorney Pro Tem Woodson Erich Dryden, Chief of Police Michael Gerke, Director Steven C. McCraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Perry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Netlist, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Netlist, Inc.
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Dean Paul
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Telecom Network Solutions, LLC v. AT&T Corp et al
as 2:2021cv00415
Plaintiff:
Telecom Network Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Corp., AT&T Communications LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Michael Dean Paul
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Walker v. Thomas
as 6:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
LaTonya Walker
Defendant:
Michael Dean Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Lumpkin
as 20-40775
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Dean Perry
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Dean et al v. California Resources Corp.
as 3:2020cv00091
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean and Terry Smith
Defendant:
California Resources Corp.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00119
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perry v. Davis
as 2:2019cv00304
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Perry
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. Davis
as 2:2019cv00157
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Perry
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
