Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dixon v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Jacob Michael Dixon
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Dixon v. Foremost Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv05052
Plaintiff:
Michael Dixon
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan and Foremost Insurance Co Grand Rapids Michigan
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dixon et al v. Roberts et al
as 3:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Michael Anthony King, United States of America and Emily Gail Roberts
Plaintiff:
Lauria McDuffy, Anthony Hull and Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Martin v. Hudson Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv00892
Defendant:
Michael Dixon, Montgomery Transport, LLC and Hudson Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Nona Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowman et al v. Turner Industries Group LLC
as 1:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Anthony Loyd Bowman , All Plaintiffs , Demetrius Joseph Braud and others
Defendant:
Turner Industries Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dixon v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2013cv00466
Plaintiff:
Michael Dixon
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2011cv00397
Respondent:
James Caldwell and James LeBlanc
Petitioner:
Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Kevin Gros Offshore L L C
as 6:2011cv00663
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Dixon
Defendant:
Kevin Gros Offshore L L C
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
