Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Schmidt (PS) v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2026cv02174
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Schmidt
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Office of Hon. N. Sierra, Offices of Hon. I. Bakke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Hoid
as 26-1111
Petitioner:
In re: EDWARD HOID
Respondent:
JASON MALTERUD, JEFF SATUR, JOSHUA BURKE and others
Hoid (PS) v. Malterud et al
as 1:2026cv01358
Plaintiff:
Edward Herbert Hoid
Defendant:
Jason Malterud, Jeff Satur, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damian et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13630
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Bonifacio Damian, James Yoe, Tony Konkler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Damian et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv08666
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bonifacio Damian, James Yoe, Tony Konkler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Emily Cohen v. Johnson County Sheriff's Dept., et al., et al
as 24-3060
Defendant:
Boulder County Sheriff's Office, Michelle Sudano, Johnson County, Iowa and others
Plaintiff:
Emily Cohen
Emily Cohen v. Iowa City, Iowa, et al
as 24-2805
Plaintiff:
Emily Cohen
Defendant:
Demetrius Marlowe, Michael Hynes, Susan D. Nehring and others
Saxena v. Corinth, et al
as 24-1212
Defendant:
DANIELLE KAY KUNZE, COUNTY OF BOULDER, COLORADO, BARRY HARTKOPP and others
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.