Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lamont Karriem v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 23-15164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless, KELLY MAHILL, BRETT ZIMMERMAN, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity and others
Michael Kelley v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-16775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EVAN KELLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Lamont Karriem v. Cellco Partnership, et al
as 22-15600
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT GARNER KARRIEM
Defendant / Appellee:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA Verizon Wireless, KELLY MAHILL, BRETT ZIMMERMAN, Assistant Sheriff in his personal capacity and others
Tripati v. Carter et al
as 2:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Paul Edward Carter, Unknown Carter, Michael Evan Gottfried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans et al v. Albertson's LLC
as 2:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Evans and Barbara Evans
Defendant:
Albertson's LLC doing business as Haggen Northwest Fresh and Albertson's LLC a foreign limited liability company doing business as Haggen Northwest Fresh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leonard J. Leum v. Michael Evan Horowitz et al
as 2:2021cv06602
Plaintiff:
Leonard J. Leum
Defendant:
Michael Evan Horowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dolores Press, Inc., et al v. Michael Evans, et al
as 21-55480
Defendant / Appellee:
DOC'S DREAM, LLC, TINA PEREIDA, MICHAEL EVANS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELISSA SCOTT and DOLORES PRESS, INC., a California corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
