Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Michael Gorrio v. Francis, et al
as 24-1711
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRANCIS
GORRIO v. USA
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
GORRIO v. BAZEL et al
as 2:2023cv04806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant:
DR. BAZEL and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORRIO v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHORTER et al
as 2:2023cv04807
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHORTER and UNIT MANAGER WYCHUNIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORRIO v. TERRA et al
as 2:2023cv04366
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT JOSEPH TERRA, CO SHORTER, CO KEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorrio v. Correctional Officer Francis, et al
as 22-1920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRANCIS
Michael Gorrio v. Warden Dauphin County Prison, et al
as 22-1918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAUPHIN COUNTY JAIL, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Gorrio v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2022cv00703
Petitioner:
Michael Gorrio
Respondent:
Dauphin County Prison and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gorrio v. Warden of Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2022cv00562
Petitioner:
Michael Gorrio
Respondent:
Warden of Dauphin County Prison, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Commowealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Michael Gorrio v. Correctional Officer Francis, et al
as 21-2945
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRANCIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
