Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bray Murray v. Collen McCoy, et al
as 23-2582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAY JIBRIL MURRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
COLLEN MCCOY, CHARLIE J. MCKEOWN, CO COOPER and others
Ortiz v. SCI Dallas, et al
as 3:2023cv00214
In Re:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
M. Sopata, A. A. Smith, D. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rainey v. Ransom et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Rainey
Defendant:
Kevin Ransom, Jason Bohinski, Richardo Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 1:2022cv01816
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mcdaniels
Defendant:
c/o Starks, c/o Rasheed, SCI-Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles TalbertIn re: Charles Talbert
as 22-2293
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, Deputy Secretary for Administration of the DOC, TABB BICKELL, Executive Deputy Secretary for the Institutional Operations of DOC and others
Talbert v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2021cv01231
Plaintiff:
Charles Talbert
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Christopher Oppman, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. McCoy et al
as 1:2021cv00320
Defendant:
Supt. Kevin Ransom, Michael Goyne, Charlie J. McKeown and others
Plaintiff:
Bray Jabril Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. McDonald et al
as 3:2020cv01697
Defendant:
Mr. Kilheeney, Kelly McAndrews, Mary Jo Mather and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick T Ray, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goynes v. Goynes et al
as 2:2013cv05393
Plaintiff:
Randy Michael Goynes
Defendant:
Eddie Otis Goynes, Phyllis Eileen Ward and Elizabeth Ann Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. Goyne et al
as 3:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
Danny Camacho
Defendant:
Michael Goyne , Gary Gordon and Jerome Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
