Cases 1 - 10 of 22
GRAY v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00615
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GRAY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Young v. City of Bloomington, Illinois, et al
as 23-1334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT P. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS, MCLEAN COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY and MICHAEL GRAY, Detective
GRAY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06800
Plaintiff:
WANDA GRAY and MICHAEL GRAY
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. City of Bloomington Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert P Young
Defendant:
City of Bloomington Illinois, States Attorney of McLean County and Michael Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
GRAY v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2020cv00885
Defendant:
POWELL, FRENCH and I. A. JOSEPH
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. COLESTOCK
as 1:2019cv04175
Defendant:
ELIZABETH COLESTOCK
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. ZATECKY
as 1:2018cv01177
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GRAY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRAY v. CARTER, JR. et al
as 1:2018cv01005
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., HUBERT DUNCAN, K M SIMONE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAY v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv03986
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GRAY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
